Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
When the other alternative is abstinence, then condoms do promote AIDS. Abstinence is the only thing that is 100% effective, and while condoms are highly effective, once in a while people still contact HIV when using them. While the church's assertation in that story is stupid (ie. that condoms have holes that viruses can fit through), it is true that they don't always work.
So promoting something that is 100% effective over something that is less than that, is not genocidal - quite the opposite actually.
And like I said, Catholic countries tend to have lower rates of HIV infections. They must be doing something right.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/he...ing-per-capita
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/re...-as-percentage
No correlation:
http://www.nationmaster.com/plot/rel...aid_percap/all |
I'm actually impressed that you went to such lengths to defend a position that is so fundamentally backwards.
Deliberately misleading a race of people regarding the health risks associated with PREVENTATIVE CARE of a disease that will kill at the very least 67 million africans in the next twenty years is systematic genocide.