Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
I don't know - but would it have been smart to take that risk and call his bluff?
I don't think it would have.
If he didn't want to go anywhere BUT Pitt he should have said that from the start. Instead he put Feaster in a position where he would look like a chump - something Feaster was perfectly capable of doing without Iginla's help.
|
You have yet to comment where your change of feeling came in on this topic. A few pages back it was noted you originally said this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
This is exactly right.
Iginla exercised the rights he had in his negotiated contract. Don't blame him.
That restricted severely the number of teams that Jay Feaster could deal with and had the expected impact on the return netted. Don't blame him.
No blame here. Just the nature of NTCs.
|
and have now moved on to calling Iginla a "dink".
What changed?