Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
PE first vote on me questions the direction of the group and lays it at my feet. Disagreeing with a posters opinion is fine, but it isn't usually the sole reason for voting for them.
Vote 2 from PE. This time says that I declare a host wouldn't vote the way I voted, like I said without a doubt that no host would be in on both lynches. I said I thought it was less likely, not that it was impossible. I was trying to think what the hosts would do and how they would vote, it seemed logical to me that they wouldn't want to be in both votes. I'm not sure why he is saying that I'm acting like it should be certainty to everyone when I didn't even say it was a certainty to me.
My point is that all of these votes against me lack any real substance, and they don't have any real effort or thought put into them. Both Diss and mrkajz seem like they are trying to come up with something so they use vague reasons and hypothetical host scenarios. PE's votes are pretty much because he disagrees with my reasoning and then either misinterprets what I said or chose to manipulate it to fit his argument. Puxlut generally seems to dislike me.
|
Party how come earlier when I did this post about the votes against me so far you didn't comment on it?(I cut down the content to just the stuff that applies to you, post #1137). The only thing you commented on was when Puxlut said she just disliked my posting style and her gut said I was scummy.
Now you seem to be saying the same thing I brought up earlier, that you were manipulating what I said.