Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
I think saying you got no support probably a bit overstated, you got no votes, but Lego has always been on my list, but never a top suspect. I suspect that's true for others. I will quote some of my "suspicious of Lego posts" below. The common theme is I think he's suspicious but there's someone else I think is more suspicous. Which is probably not a bad place for him to be if he's scum.
|
I disagree that I overstated it. Votes are support. If you didn't vote for Lego, then you didn't support my crusade. I understand it's a game, so I'm not angry. I'm just perplexed by people voting for him now that he switched out, rather than when I was openly campaigning for it. Instead of joining the Lego vote, three townies were voted instead. There are always people that are going to be suspicious, but until you vote for someone, you haven't supported the lynch against them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
I think starseed subbing in for him is just one more confirmation that he could be scum who doesn't have enough time to play effectively as scum, and keep up with the scum thread as well. As previously mentioned, the time difference could have made it harder for them to coordinate. I'm not going to switch my vote from party to starseed just yet, but I'm definitely considering it.
One final thought, if starseed has taken over a mafia position, he's dangerous. I remember how he played in the parker/barrow double mafia game, and he was deadly as a mafia member.
|
Reading the above quote in context with ECF (a dead townie) stating he didn't trust bizaro, it really reads like a post from a host. If bizaro is a host, this is a perfect opportunity to try and cast doubt on a new player to take any suspicion away from himself.