Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
Here's the progression
- An argument was being made that Janko had a great tournament
- You minimized it by calling it "solid"
- Someone posted he was an all star to further support the notion his tournament was better than solid
You were the one that then took the leap to assume that the person was using that as evidence that he was a good chance to make the NHL and pulled a list together to prove otherwise. No one was making this argument - so you started to argue a completely different point.
Basically you started to argue against a position that no one had taken - which is that him making the all-star team was somehow strong evidence on his likelihood to make the NHL. No one stated that. The point was being made in support of how good a tournament he has.
|
I wasn't the one who said his tournament was "solid" so it would appear your the one taking the leap and arguing over nothing. Telling me I was trying to minimize his tournament when I wasn't even the one who said that. But yes keep telling me what I mean even after I clarify differently.