Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey
Well what was the point of saying he made the tournament all star game? That he performed well and it was good progression to see? Basicslly exactly what I said when I posted the list. Is there something so wrong with adding to that and trying to put everything into perspective? Are we only allowed to post Jankowski's praises and ignore everything else? I think you take issue with it because you think I'm hoping on his failure which is not true.
|
Here's the progression
- An argument was being made that Janko had a great tournament
- You minimized it by calling it "solid"
- Someone posted he was an all star to further support the notion his tournament was better than solid
You were the one that then took the leap to assume that the person was using that as evidence that he was a good chance to make the NHL and pulled a list together to prove otherwise. No one was making this argument - so you started to argue a completely different point.
Basically you started to argue against a position that no one had taken - which is that him making the all-star team was somehow strong evidence on his likelihood to make the NHL. No one stated that. The point was being made in support of how good a tournament he has.