Quote:
Originally Posted by Party Elephant
Alright then. Like I've said, I'm new to this mafia game. I'm a bit jealous that lots of you are posting analyses of posters based off "how they played the last game(s)" as I'm just starting from scratch with all of you. I noticed early on that a lot of you were saying that the people not posting a lot are suspicious, I guess only one mentioned me by name though.
I was trying to get in on the game when I read and agreed with Seb's post. I don't really have a lot to say and I'm still feeling out how the game works so the idea made sense. Some of you think it's suspicious, fine, but GGG voting for me based on that flimsy logic really irritated me.
I'm not crazy about the way GGG and HG are steering the discussion, like we all have to fit their agenda or we must be scum. Seems suspicious to me. That's what my vote is based off.
|
Did it take you a day to post this because of the time difference between you and your other scum buddies? The reason you voted for me was you were pissed you got voted for, now that you have thought about it you have come up with other justifications but you really should own your reasons for your vote.
One problem with this set up is that we don't get additional info in the night phase from kills. We get our lynch, and a 50/50 chance of finding who the spore was passed to. We need to generate discussion ourselves and thus far we aren't doing enough. So yes in a game where the town can only win by forcing people to have a discussion I will steer people into having discussions and putting votes on record.
We need to have everyone vote for someone by the end of today. On day 1 you don't need a good reason.