Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Azure
One of the posters disagreed with me(I believe it was Hakan) saying most people don't like them because of their amatuer style of reporting, and not because of their right-wing bias.
Then Lanny comes along and proves my point.
|
Actually, you made no point, as usual. You wanted the summation of FauxNews and I gave it to you in spades. Any organization that censors its reports in favor of their advertizing revenue ceases to be a news organization. FauxNews admits they tell their people what to report, when to report it, and how to report it. As Roger Ailes has said, "They will tell you what is news".
Quote:
And we were in the process of talking about how Chomsky is obviously left-leaning, yet Bingo and others should still look upon his writing as being credible, despite the left-wing bias, but I'm not allowed to post anything from Fox News because they're right wing? Or for that matter, anything from O'Rielly, Hannity, Savage, Limbaugh, etc...and have the posters here actually read it as a credible source of information, instead of them dismissing it simply because of the reputation of the author?
Double standard......
|
How about you produce something of value from O'Rielly, Hannity, or Limbaugh that is not couched in hate and bias? I don't lump Savage in there because I actually don't mind reading the little twink. He leans right, but he practices some common sense and isn't just hanging on to the Republican teet drinking what ever comes out.
Chomsky is an academic and will openly debate anyone, and crush them in short order. O'Rielly, Hannity, and Limbaugh have to manufacture garbage as they go along, shout over their opponent, tell them to SHUT UP, or just cut their mics off. Real debating champions that come ready for a fight.
