Read that article. The end bit caught my attention...
Quote:
|
“Just as a girl wearing a short skirt is not an invitation for a sexual assault, a girl sending a text with an explicit photo is not an invitation for sexual activity,”
|
Ummmm.... Wait. What?
So if a girl sends me an uninitiated, uninvited pic of her tits that's all well and good, but if I decide to reply with a glorious pic of my junk, I'm some sort of e-rapist?
#### that. I don't buy it for a second. If she sends me a naked picture or sexts me first, that is full on the A-OK, "Go Ahead" to reply in the same way. Also why aren't we up in arms over the girl sending those in the first place? Automatically assuming every guy wants to see that?
This is getting absolutely out of hand. Sounds like they're trying to sympathize with the "opps, I regret doing that after the fact" crowd.