Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
You are missing the point of the argument. For example, if you call to boycott a country based on illegal occupation issues - you have to be consistent and call to boycott other countries involved in illegal occupation issues (e.g. Russia/Japan, Armenia/Azerbaijan, Turkey/Greece, UK/Argentina etc.). Same principle goes for women equality, population oppression, sexual orientation persecution etc. Pick an issue, any issue – and then be consistent in calling to boycott all countries based on this issue. Then your public position is consistent and respected. If you narrow your boycott on a wide-spread issue to only one country – chances are, your motivation is questionable.
|
No. You don't. With that type of reasoning... why bother trying to fix anything?