Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I'm almost wondering if they need to have a review, then go to a panel in Toronto and vote. The vote isn't is it conclusive? Just goal or no goal based on what they are seeing.
Then you get away from having to prove something you know to be true, and into logic.
Almost like a court room with "reasonable" doubt, not complete doubt.
|
this.
of all the solutions to this problem put forward, this is the most sensible option. no zany gadgetry, just judgement, they are after all 'goal judges' are they not?
3 guys in the war room, goal or no goal, you have to make a choice.
'inconclusive' just isn't good enough anymore. nut up and tell us in or out.
there should never ever ever ever ever ever be a situation where the official in the war room says to himself "do i think it was a goal? yes. am i ruling it a goal, no"