Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I'm almost wondering if they need to have a review, then go to a panel in Toronto and vote. The vote isn't is it conclusive? Just goal or no goal based on what they are seeing.
Then you get away from having to prove something you know to be true, and into logic.
Almost like a court room with "reasonable" doubt, not complete doubt.
|
What the ref sees on the ice should count for something too. The technology is not there yet to say that the war room will always make the better call than a guy on the ice will with his eyes. If they ever get to that point with goal line technology, then they can start moving in that direction.