Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC
The 04 one I'm still not 100% You can't see white between the puck and the line and so it's inconclusive to me. And they didn't even review it anyways.
This is just ridiculous. The fact that someone looks at these multiple angles and can say it wasn't across the line just destroys my entire world view. How can that be possible? Whether it was in the air or not, it was completely flat and clearly a good amount of space between the puck and the goal line. Much more conclusive than 04 IMO.
|
If the puck was directly above the line a few inches off the ice, you'd be able to see white in front of it. This is why the cameras will never work.
Need hawkeye.