Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lanny_MacDonald
My belief is that when the plan for the attack was originally discovered (in 1998) that it was studied and leveraged. I think that there was an element who had access to the information and knew how the attack was to take place, and they used that to their advantage.
That's how I see it anyways. Too many coincidences happened that were controlable by a select few people. Too many trails all lead to the same door. It's not that complex as most of it is misdirection, which we know the White House has been masterful at over the past six years. It's not a hugely complex conspiracy theory, and it just leverages the assets that certain people had at their disposal. That's the beauty of the plan, is that it is so simple and uses pieces already in play to cover their tracks.
|
I thank you very much for the response Lanny. As a person who isn't super-versed in all the theories and what not, that was the one thing I hadn't heard a lot about, was what role terrorism actually played in the attack for some conspiracy theorists.
I appreciate what you believe, and I agree that because the day was so chaotic, a lot of people were reporting a lot of different things, hence why there is so much controversy now.
I do not share your beliefs at all but can appreciate the passion you have for it.
It's a passion I do not share, likely because I am not american, but I do find the debate itself to be interesting.
Again, thanks for the long response.