Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
It was reported on reuters website.
|
What was reported? The story of the altered photo or the photo itself accompaning a news story?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
They took it down now but just having the pictures on verious websites shows that the story hit print.
|
Which websites?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
Did you read the links that I posted?
|
Reported after the fact.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
As I have said on another post, I agree that a few darker smoke clouds does little to sway the public one way or the other put it was done.
|
Darkening the shadows adds contrast. Not an unimportant visual consideration. Makes the photo look better.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
Also adding several added missles to a picture does nothing but try to show an image that Israel is firing willy nilly into Lebanon.
|
I really don't know what you're talking about. It's about smoke plumes, isn't it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
Like you say, these picture have very little meaning what I am worried about is what else has gotten out that has been doctored. Ones done by proffessionals and we wouldn't be able to tell.
|
Here's a heads-up: They all get caught. Doesn't matter if it's a Beriut building being bombarded or a ribbon-cutting at a local dog show.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
Either the editors at routers are incompetent or want the images slanting the actual facts.
|
I'd wager that a few slipped by the Reuters photo editors. It happens. Point the finger of blame at the photographer.