Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Barnes
Yes they were staggered. They were also made by Otis. All these theories seem to use the premise that this or that is impossible. Show me why it is impossible. Prove to me that the freight elevator wasn't breached and the fire doors were intact and the building wasn't damaged enogh to cause the elevators from the other sky lobbies to fall and that the shafts could of in no way concentrated the explosion sending burning jet fuel through them. Or, you could keep linking to websites that all use each other as sources.
|
Okay, two reasons. First, the firemen in the building said it wasn't. There is sworn testimony from firemen and EMS crews who state the elevators were not breached. Second, that's the way the systems are engineered. You have a problem on one floor the systems are designed to prevent the problem from spreading. You know what fire proof doors are supposed to do? Prevent the spread of fire. But no, in your little dream world a highly flamable liquid, that is vaporized the minute the wings are shattered crashing into the facade of the WTC, is some how going to run across the floor, find its way through the fire doors in quantities enough to start catestrophic explosions elsewhere in the building. It's impossible!!!
Here's an experiment for you. Take a balloon filled with a highly flamable liquid like kerosene. Throw it at a flaming screen door. Now see how much liquid ends up hitting the ground. I'll give you a clue, next to none.
Now how do we know that the liquid fuel did not make this magic trip across the floor like you suggest? Because the floors were not comepletly incinerated. How do we know this, because survivors were seen hanging out of the holes in the facade after the fire had basically burned itself out (that would be the reason for all that black smoke, the fire was starving for fuel and oxygen). If the fuel had spread across the floor, and burned at the heat and duration the Commission report suggests, the people on those floors would have been barbequed. The fact that they were alive and waving for help proves without a doubt that the fires were not as intense as suggested, and that the fuel did not flow across the building.
Now, can you prove that what you "theorize" (and it is nothing but a theory as well) is correct? Can you disprove anything that I have outlined? The testimony, the science, the blue prints and the pictures don't lie. Your turn.