Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
Cause it's a pretty loaded question. Is it your sole purpose to bait people into saying something that could get them jumped on? Literally any time I see an even slightly controversial post, you are two lines under it with a passively aggressive post trying to goat them into saying something they might regret.
I wouldn't be happy or "okay" with any rioting but at this point, the system is pretty stacked against people living in low income areas in the USA so I could sympathize with the people who are tired of it, see the odds stacked against them from the get-go and decide they have had enough.
The US is primed for some what of a civil war and I couldn't really fault the oppressed for actually fighting back. These riots in Baltimore are nothing of the sort though so I don't know why you're bring this up?
Civil wars aren't fought against your own side.
|
Polak, you have a history of posting, then other posters (not just me) seek clarification on what you have posted. Inevitably you backpeddle or say it was taken out of context or that PC crowd is out in full force.
You know what you wrote:
Quote:
|
....I'd be completely fine with an oppressed group saying "No More" and fighting back...They are not fighting back and going and attacking police stations. They are not fighting back and going after big business. They are not fighting back and attacking the affluent areas. They are not fighting back against anybody....
|
It reads as you would be "completely fine" with those actions.
Civil Wars aren't fine. They are ####ing tragic and wasteful.