Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Those guys who made Loose Change sure did their research, didn't they?
|
In some regards yes, in other regards no. They fit the evidence to their theory, not allow the evidence to stand on it own. Don't confuse those guys with the people who actually look at this thing objectively and see if the evidence stands up. Doing so would be like allowing Pat Robertson to be the spokesman for all Christians, or Usama bin Laden to be the spokesman for all Muslims. Some people get some air time that don't deserve it. I will give the kids that
Loose Change some credit, they got people talking about the subject. A lot of the conversation has been negative, but some of it has been positive. Some of their theories are way out there (there are a lot of people who have unrealistic theories) but some of them have lead to some good questions that have lead to other discoveries. Out of bad can come some good.
Now if you want to continue this discussion, and care to post particulars, and not try to paint the whole subject with that paint roller, I'll discuss your objections. But if you're going down the road you appear to be, its no use. Your mind is closed on the subject.