View Single Post
Old 08-07-2006, 02:38 PM   #13
Lanny_MacDonald
Lifetime Suspension
 
Lanny_MacDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevanGuy
1) Do you believe planes hit the WTC?
Of course I believe planes hit the WTC. There is irrefutable proof of multiple video streams, many of which were shot by amateur's observing the events after the strike on the first tower.

Quote:
2) Do you believe the government (or a similar entity I guess) imploded WTC 1,2 and 7? If so, what was reason/benefit?
Yes, I support the implosion theory. There is just too much evidence to think otherwise IMO. There is not enough damage to the buildings to force their collapse. These structures were designed to take the stike of a fully loaded 707 to the central core of the building, a plane larger than those employed, and survive. As well, the fires that ensued were not hot enough, nor last long enough, to create catestrophic failure that took place. In is interesting to hear some people chase their tails while they try to explain the explosions on the other floors of the building, saying they were a result of jet fuel pouring down the elevator shafts (which were staggered and not connected as some would suggest). The central core was "broken" into a series of 8' length chunks of steel, a highly improbable result from the collapse suggested. Most damningly, the top of the first tower pitched greatly to one side, and its momentum should have carried it further away from the building and created much greater damage to surrounding buildings and a wider debris field.

So why would someone do this? The usual motivations? Money. Power. Delusions of grandeur? The PNAC had published their Mein Kampf and had stated that America needed to go back to the Reagan years of having a massive military with ungodly spending in this area. They acknowledged the only way to do this was through an event like a new Pearl Harbor. As well, they had designs on getting back into Iraq since before 1998, and they needed a viable excuse. Bush had been elected with the backing of smoe very powerful lobbies that needed to be paid back. Those lobbies just happened to be the military industrial complex and big oil. So how did things unfold because of 9/11? The military industrial complex got paid in spades. Business has never been so good for them, even during WWII and the cold war. Big oil is making record profits each and every quarter (billions). The PNAC found their way into Iraq, and Afghanistan as an added bonus. War profiteering is taking place on epic proportions. As well, they managed to claw back on our civil liberties, making it easier to monitor and prosecute us without just cause. Everyone got what they wanted, and the biggest ###### in Presidential history got elected for a second term. All of this took place because of the events of 9/11. Without this event, Bush would have been a lame duck president and would have been bounced after one term.

Now before anyone tries to suggest that Bush and Co. would not have had the cojones to sit back and watch this unfold, consider what he has done while in office. The invasion of Iraq was done without support of the military commanders because they knew what would happen to the soldiers who had to try and keep the peace. Bush didn't care. He still doesn't care. The body armor issue has been front and center, and he has done nothing. He has allowed thousands of Americans to be killed or maimed because they do not have the proper equipment, something he could have fixed with a sweep of a pen. Let's not forget that he sat and watched Katrina destroy New Orleans, even though he had advance notice of what was likely to happen. There are other examples, but these three are more than enough. Bush and Co. do not care about anyone but their own special interests. They have no conscience and would have no problem allowinf thousands to die to further their cause. They have allowed it to happen repeatedly.
Lanny_MacDonald is offline   Reply With Quote