Quote:
Originally Posted by browna
Can definitely hear a bias, and the way he rattles off the subtle changes to the Canucks lines and other small details, shows that he's very aware of the Canucks a lot more than the Flames (or any othjer team), but tonight wasn't that bad.
One call was the time that Bennett (I think) in the third made a great play and Hughson said "that looked very close to a penalty" (meaning, that should've been called).
That said, Game 1 and 2 watched at a pub with, and was there two nights ago.
I am sure he'll ramp it up for the last hurrah in Vancouver.
|
I think the subtle changes are that he is more familiar with Vancouver than with Calgary. If you put Hrudy and Ball in I suspect you would get the same thing. The panel (including Hrudy) is definately Calgary centric.
All in all it's very watchable and a quality call. The only guy I would like more is Cuthbert.