Quote:
Originally Posted by jemjey
No doubt Stone has played clutch down the stretch. Not taking anything away from him. However I'd argue Johnny is not only steady and consistent, but also huge when it matters most. So really the choice is steady, consistent AND clutch (johnny) vs. Clutch (stone). Johnny has been playing just as, if not more of, an important role as Stone - but he's shown an ability to do it throughout the season.
I'd argue the all-star selection isn't meaningless. After all, like you said he was selected because he was already there for the weekend. Stone wasn't because he wasn't chosen as an "all-star" rookie. Illustrates the above point: Johnny's ability to be an impact player throughout the season. Also, tons of media exposure surely doesn't hurt his chances.
All that being said, Stone is a hell of a rookie and player. Credit to him for putting himself in the conversation. But coming from someone who has watched games from both players (opposed to the sens fans who clearly had never watched Johnny and were just looking at stats):
Johnny has been a larger impact, for a longer period, on a weaker team, and has achieved just as much/more team and individual success.
Johnny for Calder!!
|
I agree that Johnny will likely win it...but I don't think it's a total lock. Stone has played unreal since the All-Star break and led the Sens to an improbable run of potentially making the playoffs.
Since the all-star break, Stone is averaging over a point a game and sits 5th in points...out of ALL players. Not just rookies!
Again, if the Sens make the playoffs, you can't fault a writer for voting Stone over Gaudreau. They've both had incredible seasons and it wouldn't be an injustice if one won it over the other. Throw Ekblad into the mix and it'll be a total toss-up!