Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Hey I took your data set and took out all the ones that didn't support my conclusion and it now supports my conclusion!
|
Not really I made the assertion that buildings from the 20's, 30's 40's & 90's (from a defunct team) were not as relevant to the utility and life cycle of the Saddledome as buildings from the 60's, 70's & 80's.
It you look at the opening dates for the buildings I said were more relevant I was vary consistent.
The way entertainment facilities are utilized has undergone a complete paradigm shift in the past 20 years. So there is are reason all of those building from the 20's and all of those building from the 70's expired at roughly the same time.
(if I was cherry picking data I would have kept Winnipeg & MSG)