Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
The questions have been addressed. But they have NOT been answered. Until a model exists that definitively captures the data and is 100% accurate in describing and differentiating, nothing has been answered.
Many articles have been written, but no one has been able to push things significantly forward yet. So they have not been answered, unless one believes that all useful information is in fact now being captured and there is no more information to garner.
Attempting to differentiate shot quality, but discovering that it doesn't help, is not definitive proof that shot quality doesn't matter. It only means that , so far, the information and techniques/methods aren't good enough to push the science forward and qualify as a bona fide improvement. That does not mean that there aren't improvements still to be made.
|
According to these war-on-ice guys, scoring chances are (slightly) better than corsi for determining future goals:
http://blog.war-on-ice.com/scoring-c...er-than-corsi/