well good for Winnipeg and good for Copp. I have him in the CPHL, so I've followed his progress ... he's a good prospect. However I don't get what you're trying to sell here and what it does have to do with Jankowski. "Copp has progressed quicker/better than Jankowski because he's scored more points?" - is that your argument here? Because statlines can be deceiving.
you get caught in the PPG trap when you try to compare Copp and Jankowski by only looking at their numbers. Copp played for the University of Michigan, and their team scores a lot more goals than Providence does. Just look at their roster - Dylan Larkin, Zach Hyman, Boo Nieves, Zach Werenski, JT Compher, Tyler Motte. All very good prospects ... it's simply a very deep team. So OF COURSE Copp got more points. He simply has more quality players to work with than Jankowski.
Jankowski might have scored less points, but he's been involved in more goals percentage-wise than Copp. This year, Michigan scored 143 goals and Providence scored 104 so far, according to hockeyDB. Copp had 31 points this year, meaning he was involved in .217% of all Michigan goals. Jankowski has 23 points this year, meaning he's been involved in .221% of all Providence goals.
Last edited by devo22; 03-27-2015 at 11:36 AM.
|