Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff
I am tired of pseudo-intellectual navel-gazing and data-wonking masquerading itself as enlightenment
|
This caught my eye. In a previous life, I used to do a lot of Six Sigma project work. Part of that was working with guys who had PhD's in all kinds of math related fields. Real smart people with decades of experience analyzing data and drawing conclusions from it.
Have any of the PhD types looked at hockey related data and done any sort of real analysis on it? All I'm really seeing is amateur type enthusiasts seemingly without any sort of related credentials working on this stuff.
If more of the smart types working on this, we might get past using luck as a means to describe things that don't fit a mold which seemingly only works 65% of the time.