Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun
That's quite a list. How many of those had multiple murder convictions? None I bet.
You do realize that I only suggested that the death penalty would only be for serial killers?
|
Actually if you click on any name on the list you can see the details of the crime they didn't commit. Most, almost all, are multiple murder cases. If not multiple, then cases involving rape and murder or murder of a child, a police officer, (in the 70's a white person), something more awful than just first degree murder (unless you're in Texas).
Each and every case had proof beyond a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the accused. So I'm not sure why you think serial killers are more worthy of the death penalty than multiple murderers. Is their standard of proof higher than anyone else? Your weird concept makes no sense.