I don't disagree with the experts in terms of his state. I guess you can say I disagree with the experts risk analysis mainly due to the severity of his last episode.
As for the optics, I'm over them now. That's what my inital opinion was formed on and that's why it changed.
Honestly, it's not going to change. I wish everyone involved the best. 7 years of observation for such a severe episode will never seem like enough to me to guarantee the safety of the public. When life is involved I don't see the harm in being as careful as possible.
Last edited by polak; 02-27-2015 at 04:37 PM.
|