Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
Caught up in what again?
You want him to serve his sentence (which is different from your stance a couple days ago that he should never be allowed out) but also ignore the fact he wasn't sentenced? This isn't a little detail, you can't say he should serve his sentence if he doesn't have one. If you want an "equivalent sentence", how do you come to a date for his release?
If it's based on rehabilitation/mental health, well it's arguably he served that stage of the sentence as his psychiatrists are recommending to the board to move him to Winnipeg's hospital.
If it's based on punishment, you're advocating punishing a man who had no control over his actions? For what purpose? What good does that do? How many years do you want?
|
Umm the entire time I was arguing that he should be kept under supervision for longer. Not that he should be held locked up forever. Never once did I say that.
I think he should be supervised for longer. That's all. It's only been 7 years.
It's not based on punishment, it's based on risk and apperance. Apperance to appease the public and the victims.