Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
But you're basing your argument more on that he is a threat to the public, correct? But if educated and trained professionals disagree with your opinion, why do you disagree?
|
I don't disagree that he is better and isn't a risk when he's on medication.
However do you notice that caveat there? Medication. Leaving him unsupervised leads to the very real risk of him no longer being on his medication and being able to harm others again.
You know, if they put some sort of device that forced him to take his medication for the rest of his life (and tracks him until that is deemed no longer necessary) that he could not remove in anyway, then I'd be all for it. If he is cured and the doctors are vouching for him that he is not a threat then great cause we know he is no longer a flight risk.
Relying on a mentally unstable man to not flee when unsupervised is what I can't get past and the eagerness of the doctors to let him go unsupervised is why I think the system is broken.