Quote:
Originally Posted by blender
The thing that gets me about this debate is why we are even having it. I've always wondered what the motivation of predictive analysis is. To gain a gambling edge? Or is it just the human need to assign meaning to things.
As fan of sports, hockey in particular, and the Flames especially, I know why I like to watch; the thrill of the game and the uncertainty of the outcome. Down three to the Bruins for the win; blowing a two-goal lead on the Ducks. I was there in the moment watching my team perform, for good or for bad. I don't need or want a flawed analysis, and frankly, don't know why anyone would. What is the purpose in the middle of a playoff race.
I think that is why a lot of members here bristle at the concept of analytics.
Anyways, obviously just my two cents, so take it or leave it. I'll be watching the Flames go after two much-needed points on Tuesday in New York City. Hope you can put down the stop watch or slide rule and enjoy the game, too.
|
Ah, but you see, playing the game is exactly the type of debate, an on-ice type, that Kid Fancy Stats does not have time for.