View Single Post
Old 02-18-2015, 10:29 AM   #20
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkajz44 View Post
No I'm not, I'm placing a value on the tax I would have had to pay today, rather than pay it in 30 years.

Say I make $100 and my tax rate is 30%.

Option 1 - Get taxed at 30% now and invest the $70
Option 2 - Invest in RRSP and invest $100 now

Over time, the $100 will earn far more money than the $70. Let's say we triple our money by retirement.

Option 1 - I have tax of 30% on my earnings of $140, so $42, leaving me with a total of $168 ($210 less tax of $42)
Option 2 - I have tax of 30% on my entire RRSP amount of $300, so $90, leaving me with $210 ($300 less tax of $90)

I never changed my marginal rate of tax, it stayed constant at 30%. Yet, I've come out ahead in option 2 with the RRSP because I was able to earn income on the $30 that wasn't taxed up front.
Where is anyone claiming that it's better to invest in non-registered plans than an RRSP? The argument is that it's better to invest in a TFSA. So taking your example:

Option 1 - Get taxed at 30% now and invest the $70 into a TFSA.
Option 2 - Invest in RRSP and invest $100 now

Over time, the $100 will earn far more money than the $70. Let's say we triple our money by retirement.

Option 1 - I have no tax on my earnings of $140, so I have $210.
Option 2 - I have tax of 30% on my entire RRSP amount of $300, so $90, leaving me with $210 ($300 less tax of $90)

However, if there's any plan for any other income during retirement, through pensions, etc, all of that income is taxed at the higher tax rate. If I used a TFSA, that income is taxed at a lower bracket, or not at all, if it's below the exemption limit.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to V For This Useful Post: