Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
The only puzzling thing to me here is all the mention of "we're going to need him down the stretch" which to me doesn't mean much. He hasn't done a lot for us as is, what's to say during this "stretch" he's going to pick up and play like the player we've seen him be in the past?
It's a dice roll at best, if a hockey trade is available you do what's going to make you best down the road. If we get a good offer and it make sense, you deal him away its as simple as that. Who's to say the person we call up has one of those "miracle" stretches of hockey or a good consistent stretch themselves.
All this hearsay puppet "what if scenarios" really needs to stop, there's no guarantee's in hockey so lets not act like Glenny will turn into the savior we expect down the "stretch". 
Just my 2 cents. |
I agree the only thing we know for sure is what Glencross brings to the table. Bar a 9 game slump, he has been fairly consistent his whole career.