Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage
Part of me thinks the most we could get is a 3rd, then part of me remembers that David Perron fetched a 1st. I don't know what to think.
|
Perron has term left, GlenX doesn't. Not apples to apples.
Thinking about this more, Anaheim hasn't been a big player in rentals. They passed on Cammy last year and this was an except from their lack of activity last year:
Murray said he even made the unusual move, for him, of pursuing a “rental player,” meaning an unrestricted free agent.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/sports...305-story.html
Barring a major philosophical change, can't see the ducks moving a first for GlenX. Pittsburgh already dealt their first this year. Would leave only WPG or BOS if we are standing firm on a first rounder for GlenX. Would deal the first they got from Buffalo for a rental despite being a draft and develop team? Would Boston deal their first after dealing their first in 2013? Doesn't line up for us to get a first back in a deal for GlenX upon initial review.