View Single Post
Old 02-16-2015, 11:02 AM   #123
Psytic
First Line Centre
 
Psytic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
As per bolded, I can...that's exactly what this team needs given where they are right now. Bolstering some depth to make a push for the playoffs with an NHL ready defenseman who's a rental. As to the cost, that's up for debate.

Same goes for up front. A couple depth rentals (and keeping Glencross) is fine, as long as the price is fine. It's not about upsetting chemistry or deviating from the long term plan, its about getting NHL experience in the lineup in case of injuries, and giving some guys time off down the stretch.

The way this team has fought to this point to get where they are, IMO management owes the roster some depth to make this totally unexpected playoff dream a reality with 2 months to go in the season.

Good to hear the Flames were in on Franson.
His point is the cost is more than we are willing to spend. We arent jepordizing the future for a rental. If the market is set at a 1st for a 2nd pair dman, I doubt we will bite unless its a hockey trade with term.
Psytic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Psytic For This Useful Post: