Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Is your point that the games he missed just happened to be the ones in which he wouldn't have scored, thus reducing his PPG? Because the PPG is a simple fact.
Your point isn't really valid, since
(a) Bennett isn't a lock, having never played an NHL game and why would you cut a vet even if a rookie shows well in the early season?
(b) Jooris and Granlund are in no way, shape or form in a competition with Backlund, since he is miles ahead of both, and still only 25. Further, both Granlund and Jooris can play wing, as well or better than they play centre. They won't sit, unless there are better wingers. If that's the case, then they can be moved too, for assets that the Flames need.
(c) Stajan is only under contract for 3 more years, but you knew that. His $3 million looks less and less costly as the cap goes up. He may well be dealt next year, but only because he is older and not part of the eventual cup contender, not because one of the kids has suddenly become better than him. I think it far more likely that he's dealt the year after, when his contract has only a year left.
|
Unequivocally, if backs had played in all the games, his Ppg would be greatly reduced. Pay attention to his fresh legs first five games back vs. last 5 (removing 'free point night' vs the no good team up north).
As per 'A' he should be a lock barring future injury, he won his spot this year vs. the same crop? Unless we're bringing in Mike and Brad Richards and Toews, I don't see this changing.
'B'acks is 26 in minutes and will be 27next year, young is now prime. Flames are already log jammed at the wings, no room for two more and all of these guys are better at centre.
Doubtful Stajan is trade able with his contract. Even then, none of the 4 mentioned above are made to be a 4th line centre.