Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Should option 2 read, "3 points for reg win, 2 pts for OT/SH win, 1 pt for loss"?
|
I voted for that option, assuming that is the case. Been saying it for a while, the 3 point system makes the most sense. The argument that it skews the record book is bogus. It has already been skewed with the addition of overtime and the shootout. No one cares about historic point totals.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|