Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
I'd be curious to see what some of you in the "they killed her" camp think about Right To Die laws. To me, it's kind of the same ballpark. How far does a society need to go to ensure people live, if they're having a negative impact on a family unit by forcing someone to live? For sure, the child aspect is different, but the impact on the family can be just as negative.
|
I think everyone in this thread has no problem with ADULTS right to refuse treatment.
It's the children we want protected from irresponsible and clueless parents.
Also, this case wouldn't even be subject to the traditional right to die and euthanasia debate since those are pretty clear cut illegal for treatable cases like this one. No doctor in Canada would perform Euthanasia on someone with a 75% - 80% chance of survival.