Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
It isn't a thinly veiled anything - Smid and Engelland aren't good enough. I don't need +/- to tell me that, and Neither do you.
+/- confirms the four weakest links on the team. They're exactly who we thought they were.
|
Isn't one of the complaints that Eggs and Smid are not good synergy players to each other? I think Wideman wouldn't be as good if paired with someone other than Russell. I also think someone said Wotherspoon and Smid weren't bad last year. It would be interesting to see if Eggs or Smid had a faster puck mover paired with them, whether it could help to improve their +/- (Similar in nature to comments about Stajan helping out the 4th line)
The above argument about who is in front of Smid and Eggs is a good one too.
Consider pairing up this thread with the chemistry thread... does it help?
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=143576