Quote:
Originally posted by Lanny_MacDonald@Oct 18 2004, 09:01 PM
My teacher is right IMO, because there is no two sides to the issue and in a largely conservative area that is probably what would be needed.
WTF are you talking about? What largely conservative area? What are you talking about? You are making no sense what so ever.
You're talking from a democrat point of view, so obviously the Republicans have done everything wrong, but i don't believe that 9/11 and fear is the sole heart of their campaign.
Okay, but you're talking from no point of view. You haven't quoted a point of view and haven't said anything at all to support yourself or your views. If you're going to wade into the fray come with an argument that is YOURS and come with some backup.
Kerry's record and flip flops have helped them a lot, as well as many other things Kerry's wife as well as Edwards wife have said.
Nice talking points. There is no truth to them, but nice talking points all the same. Where's Tranny when you need him? This is exactly what David Brock is talking about when he talks about innuendo becoming accepted fact. Kerry is a flip flopper (which he is not) and Bush is a great leader with a steely focus (which he is not). Bush has just as questionable a record when it comes to changing his mind, but that is not something that is talked about when it comes to the Republicans. Its well documented that Bush has had as many flip flops in the last four years as any politician. Unfortunately the talking points do not make it so to the general public.
And what do the wives of Kerry or Edwards have to do with anything? Nothing. Or does Laura Bush's vehicular manslaughter and drug sales as a younger woman come into play? They should not. Its irrellivant to the debate. Leave them out of it.
And Bush did nothing thats why Moore's all over him, i thought Bush invaded two countries one where there was good evidence that Bin Laden was located at. How did he then do nothing?
Okay, now you're just being annoying. How many people have to explain to you that Bush did nothing to prevent the 911 attacks. He had multiple briefings, including one on Aug 6, 2001, that explicitly stated an attack was coming from bin Laden, and yet he did nothing. This is why Moore and others are all over the President.
Iraq hasn't been a complete failure yet, Saddam is out of power, which was the intent of the attack.
Sorry, this was never the intent of the attack. This is part of excuse number four, which doesn't sell. So far Iraq has been a disaster and is deteriorating. The highly protected "green zone" is now subject to almost daily attacks. This is not a good sign and does not give anyone the confidence that things are going well or improving.
|
I live in Southern Alberta, our conservative candidate won 97% of the vote for MP.
You call supporting the War in Iraq, and then saying you don't to now going back to saying you would keep the troops there not flip flopping?
He supports the War, but doesn't want to support the troops?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...MNGQK8TI8O1.DTL
That is what you call not flip flopping?