Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle
As mentioned, chemo sent her to ICU. Is forcing her to take chemo and going into ICU not harm as well? So either way they should have been found criminally negligent and subjected to a lifetime of torment?
And rightly or wrongly, they blame the chemo for the stroke that killed her. So in their opinion putting her on chemo is what harmed her and killed her. Should they be criminally charged if chemo was in fact the cause of the stroke?
I don't really know where I stand on this as it's more complex than I think most people are making it out to be. But at the very least they attempted the chemo. It's not like they refused it right off the bat.
|
But, you see, because they had the choice between action which would harm the child, and inaction which would harm the child, they TOTALLY DESERVE a life of torment regardless of what they do.
It's the internet. One line of text is enough to judge people in complete absolutes. It's also enough to decide that people must be forced to conform with that thing you agree with.