Quote:
Originally posted by KootenayFlamesFan+Oct 18 2004, 08:56 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (KootenayFlamesFan @ Oct 18 2004, 08:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-sjwalter@Oct 18 2004, 09:47 PM
As the article says, if he would have kept his promises, 7,000 people would be alive today.
|
Didn't Bush also promise to hunt down and punish those responsible?
Where's Bin Laden?
I guess he's too busy invading a country that didn't attack the U.S to worry about him anymore......... [/b][/quote]
Poor arguement, as Dis said they are still hunting.
Clinton gave up even after the World Trade Center bombings were connected to Bin Laden as well as many of the other bombings carried out against the States during Clinton's era.
I guess if Clinton didn't want Bin Laden to be a hero, like he would have if the US wouldn't have caught him then you give up the attack. One mans stature in the Middle East is more important then the safety of 250 million people. Is that how all democracts think?