Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold
I can play semantics too, I didn't say natural. Can you not see any potential danger in covering the world in genetically spliced plants? You want to pick at semantics to dodge the logical fallacy in your analogy?
Such a non sequitur it's ridiculous. The by that logic red herring argument is one of the weakest around, bringing up planes in a conversation about genetic splicing as if that proves your point.
|
Humans have been cross breeding organic matter since we first learned how to farm. We didn't need a lab to create a lot of the food we have today. Its the aspect of people being scared of a new science element and not fully understanding it. 90% of the food available to us in the modern day has been crossbred by humans.
The world would adapt accordingly. In the earths history there is on going evolution . Nothing ever has stopped the world from turning. Our plants on earth have changed hundreds of times and so has the ecosystems.