Quote:
Originally posted by sjwalter+Oct 18 2004, 09:32 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sjwalter @ Oct 18 2004, 09:32 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by KootenayFlamesFan@Oct 18 2004, 08:29 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-sjwalter
|
From your own link............
"The recent discovery by the Bush administration's Iraq Survey Group (ISG) is fueling speculation, but is not proof, that the Iraqi dictator moved prohibited weapons of mass destruction (WMD) into Syria before the March 2003 invasion by a U.S.-led coalition. "
|
So if he never had them, why didn't he let the Weapons Inspectors look and prove to the world he was clean then he could have avoided the whole War, and continued to kill his people like before? [/b][/quote]
Listen........I'm not sticking up for Saddam. Of course he did some terrible things.
And there was a chance he did have WMDs.
But you said ....... "And the WMD were there".........when the link you provided yourself even states there was no proof.