We also need to stop defending things under the infallible umbrella of 'science'. It is akin to your argument about the perfect construct of God's creation.
Any time that there is a question that involves the use of scientific evidence to substantiate, the only people that don't speak in absolutes are the scientists. As our knowledge increases, so does our understanding. In this instance, as in many others, there is someone standing in the way of that free accumulation of knowledge.
Access to information in GMO vs. Global Warming is much like comparing an amoeba to a golden retriever. We can't even get an admission of GM let alone a clear idea of method and content, whereas global warming (climate change being a more accurate term), there has been an effort towards clarity.
|