Quote:
Originally posted by Displaced Flames fan+Oct 19 2004, 02:55 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Displaced Flames fan @ Oct 19 2004, 02:55 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-kipperfan@Oct 19 2004, 02:53 AM
Continually may be a "micheal moore stretch", but fact remains that the American foriegn policy under Bush is an intrusive one, that holds the prioritys of america in higher standing than the soveriegnty of foriegn citizens.
|
Thanks for admitting you're wrong, I appreciate that.
The rest of your point is nothing more than a 'yeah but' retort to my point.[/b][/quote]
2 countries in as many years, thats one country ever 2 years on average during bush's term.
Continually may have been a strong word, but im not wrong, no other country, EXPECT for Saddams Irag, which you kindly pointed out has employed a obtrusive foriegn sush as the american model of recent years, as operated in the napoleanic(sp?) way that is bushs america. And Saddam was removed for being deemed dangerous, by YOUR country, yet you praise the policys of the US, dont believe the american intentions are any more noble than that of hussien.