Quote:
Originally posted by Displaced Flames fan+Oct 19 2004, 02:20 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Displaced Flames fan @ Oct 19 2004, 02:20 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by Lanny_MacDonald@Oct 19 2004, 02:14 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-sjwalter
|
Quote:
@Oct 19 2004, 01:58 AM
And wanting world support will never clean up terrorism.# The whole world didn't want the US to invade Iraq.# Terrorism will have to come to their doors first before they decide to combat it, just like it happened to the US.
|
Well first of all, Iraq had nothing to do with 911. That is why the world did not agree to the invasion. What is so hard to understand about that? The world wants to prevent a series of unilateral invasions by stronger nations because of "perceived threats".
|
I disagree...
well, not with everything.
I don't believe Saddam had anything to do with 9-11, never have.
But, that's not why the world disagreed with the invasion. Well, maybe the common folk....but not world governments. Too many had their hands in Saddam's pie and didn't want that pie taken away.
Your talk is as if the US is a big, evil bulldozer and the rest of the nations of the world are good to the last drop and ready to put a stop to 'American Imperialism'.
You talk oodles about the corrupt US government. If you think the rest of the governments of the world (specifically those that opposed action in Iraq) are pure in their motives you are sadly mistaken.
Maybe that's not what you believe, but it sure does come off that way. [/b][/quote]
No of course other countries arent noble in the motives, but at the same time they arent stomping over the soverignty of other nations in the process of their mis-intentions, something the US has continually had no problem doing.