Quote:
Originally posted by FlamesAddiction+Oct 18 2004, 06:41 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (FlamesAddiction @ Oct 18 2004, 06:41 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-sjwalter@Oct 19 2004, 01:30 AM
Clinton responded with a missile attack, that has been reported to have struck a hospital instead of the terror camps.# If he would have really acted like you said he could have wiped out the terrorists before they became more powerful.# And why does Moore the crucify Bush if he didn't crucify Clinton who you said responded, when Bush obviously responded well.# And ground troops would have been a lot better for Clinton to send in and get the job done right.# Thats all IMO as well.
|
It didn't strike a hospital "instead" of a terrorist camp. Clinton nailed the camp as well, and hit an aspirin plant. Some people still maintain that there was more than aspirin being made at that factory, but who knows. A lot of countries build weapons and arms at ordinary factories as a way to disguise them.
One other thing you have to realize is that before 9/11, it would have been nearly impossible for Clinton to get support to invade Afghanistan. BTW, I was 100% behind Bush's decision to invade Aghanistan, so it's not like I wanted him to do "nothing" like (according to you) the Russians do (which couldn't be further from the truth if you knew anything about the Chechen conflict - the Russian army has been nothing short of brutal). [/b][/quote]
Clinton needs a permission slip to invade Afghnastan (sp?) because Bush didn't need too. Or did he ask the UN first? We all know the UN is corrupt.
I'm sure if Clinton had really pressed the issue he could have invaded Afganastan. (sp?)