Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly
Your 'better data' which has already been questioned doesn't speak very clearly to cleanliness, rather just rates of circumcision. In fact, if you look at what the wiki article says that automaton 3 posted,
Suggests that in 2006/2007 44% of Albertans are still getting snipped. So if I extrapolate the data, the rate is indeed decreasing across the country from 1970 at 43% to 32% in 2006, but Alberta still has a higher than average cut rate, that suggests to me that potentially more than half of Albertan males were still getting snipped in 1970. So your conclusion is still false.
However, I'm just going to bow out of this conversation because clearly, men don't like to be informed that sometimes, dinks stink. And in my experience stinky uncut dinks stink the worst.
Why don't we have a poll and get the % of posters that are cut vs uncut if you want a better sample size?
|
Not to single out anyone here, just that this comment reeks vaguely of "2/10 would not bang"
No offence meant to anyone. Just thought it was a funny observation (yeah, my sense of humor sucks).