Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly
And I also said I preferred uncut. You just jumped on me because I mentioned it's hard to find an uncut and clean man. Which has two mitigating factors... there aren't many uncut men my age and if you do find one who's uncut, they might not also be clean.
|
This is where you experience with a likely non-normalized sample size (under 35 dinks, say) is coloring your view.
Here are some actual numbers:
The Canadian Paediatric Society estimates of 48 percent for the prevalence of male circumcision in Canada in 1970.In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics reported that “in Canada, ~48% of males are circumcised”.
So If you are between 45 (1970 study) and 16 (1999 study) then the average has not changed in Canada - less than half of Canadian males are circumcised. So in a normal situation, if you slept with 100 guys, about would 50 would be cut and 50 uncut.
Now I am not disagreeing with you that of the X number of guys trouser snakes you've seen, that nearly all were cut - that is certainly possible. But for you to then make the wild extrapolations you've made, including the highlighted above, is what some members (lol) are taking issue with.
Also, your rather factual comment on pee drops and smelliness are very wierd... I have never heard that before, but then you take that an extrapolate it to "if you do find one who's uncut, they might not also be clean." Again, very odd, and not sure how you've proved that out. You're a chick, so respectfully, I don't think you understand the intricacies of a cut vs. uncut pork sword to make such baseless comments?
I guess what I am getting at is
- Don't use your small personal sample size and extrapolate it into generalized comments as above, if better data is a click away.
- I don't understand how you can be so sure of your view (smelly unclean uncut guys, etc) when you're a girl? I am not nearly as certain in my view of the cleanliness of a cooter based on the size of and/or protrusion and/or folds in the labia?