Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post - Treliving on Sportsnet 960. Jan 12 after 2pm

Harry Lime · 01-12-2015, 07:41 PM

I brought this up in the Granlund thread, and there was some give and take there in terms of for or against. I won't rehash the reasoning, but in terms of getting a valuable piece for Granlund, I would have to agree with puckedoff. I isolated Minnesota as a target due to the goaltender problems that they have, and a deep defensive core.

Granlund, Hiller and Diaz for
Folin (likely 3-4 defenseman, strong minutes eater), Blum (whatever happened to Blum?) and Backstrom (one year left, like Hiller)

I don't think that this is a pie in the sky proposal (like targeting Dumba), but is reasonable on both sides, and addresses needs for both clubs. It's my one proposal a year, so I'll just let it simmer here.

01-12-2015, 07:41 PM	#54
Harry Lime Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2014 Exp:	I brought this up in the Granlund thread, and there was some give and take there in terms of for or against. I won't rehash the reasoning, but in terms of getting a valuable piece for Granlund, I would have to agree with puckedoff. I isolated Minnesota as a target due to the goaltender problems that they have, and a deep defensive core. Granlund, Hiller and Diaz for Folin (likely 3-4 defenseman, strong minutes eater), Blum (whatever happened to Blum?) and Backstrom (one year left, like Hiller) I don't think that this is a pie in the sky proposal (like targeting Dumba), but is reasonable on both sides, and addresses needs for both clubs. It's my one proposal a year, so I'll just let it simmer here.